Maybelline Concealer comparison

I like the brand Maybelline generally for one product: their concealers.  I don’t like their mascaras – they smudge extremely on me.  Not truly a fan of their lipsticks – their packaging bother me (why would there be a neon outer casing that doesn’t match the bullet shade?)   Their eye shadows are just typical (although their matte single pans are good, however I concern they’re being phased out).  However, Maybelline concealers are phenomenal!  There has not been a Maybelline concealer that I’ve tried that was total rubbish.  For me, the immediate Age Rewind (IAR) concealers are one the very best under eye concealers on the market, regardless of cost point.

Since I have quite a few Maybelline concealers in my stock currently, I believed I’d do a quick comparison as well as evaluation of them:

From delegated right:
• Eraser Dark Circles treatment Concealer in medium 130
• Eraser Dark Circles treatment Concealer in Neutralizer 150
• immediate Age Rewind double deal with Perfector in Light medium 720
• in shape Me Concealer in Sand 20
• deal with studio Master conceal in Light / medium 30
• dream Lumi Touch Highlighting Concealer in Buff 340

These concealers are all extremely affordable, retailing for less than $15 as well as quickly easily accessible at a lot of drugstores.  I utilize all of these concealers generally under my eye area.  I like stick or cream concealers for acnes or redness.

I’ve swatched each of the concealers on my arm, over lines of black water resistant liquid liner (Kiss Me Heroine Make Smooth liquid Eyeliner) to show exactly how much protection each one provides:

As you can see, the double deal with Perfector conceal has the very best coverage.  The present immediate Age Rewind Eraser Dark Circles treatment Concealer is likewise rather good.  It is really the third incarnation of the IAR concealer range.  It all started with the original immediate Age Rewind Under Eye Concealer (not shown) which was in a capture tube:

I had this when upon a time as well as it was decent, it was my least much-loved of the three iterations of the Age Rewind concealers since the protection wasn’t the best, as well as it didn’t last all the time包在我身上。 I do like the capture tube packaging the very best out of all three versions though. The Face studio Master conceal reminds me of this in protection as well as consistency.

The second version of the IAR concealer was called Instant Age Rewind double deal with Perfector, which was my absolute favourite.  The conceal end was perfection: opaque as well as blendable however did not look cakey or accentuate fine lines.  The highlight end worked well in conjunction with the concealer.  My primary gripe was exactly how bit product was in the tube (2.7ml of each) – I would have much favored if they just offered the conceal end alone.  I’ve utilized up many tubes of this as well as this tube is my last one – I’m undecided if I would go in browse of a replacement from old stock (sealed packages).  I see these selling on the internet still – there seems to be a great deal of stock of the dark shade so if you’re NC45 skin tone, it would be a excellent choice for you!  Although, this was discontinued in 2011 so the remaining stock is getting a bit old / stale.

The present version of the IAR concealer, the Instant Age Rewind Eraser Dark Circles treatment Concealer is likewise excellent – it has extremely great coverage, doesn’t cake, as well as makes the under eye area look smooth.  It has somewhat less protection than the double deal with Perfector however the bottle contains a lot more than twice the amount of product (6ml).  My difficulty was discovering a appropriate shade match – I’m in between the Light and Medium.  I discover the very best option for me is to mix medium with the Neutralizer (very similar to Light shade however with a lot more coverage).  The packaging of the Eraser is not my much-loved – the sponge does seem unsanitary, although Maybelline specifies that it has been treated with antibacterial properties.  I don’t utilize the sponge to apply the concealer directly to my deal with and I haven’t had issues.

Dream Lumi Touch Highlighting Concealer was a surprise hit – I didn’t expect much from this highlighting pen, however it has respectable protection on its own as well as supplies a lifted, smooth appearance to my under eye area.  I really such as this much better than a lot more costly highlighting pens such as Clarins immediate Light Brush-On Perfector or Estee Lauder suitable Light Brush-On Illuminator. I can even get away with utilizing this alone as my concealer for laid-back days.

Face studio Master Conceal and in shape Me are both just okay for me. They have lighter protection as well as neither seem to stay put on my face.  I normally mix them with high protection concealers that are too drying (ie Mary Kay concealer or Physicians formula conceal Rx) on their own.  I won’t repurchase these 2.這是擔心我的擔憂,很多人將NARS輻射乳脂狀遮瑕膏造成Maybelline的形狀,考慮到我不喜歡我,但我真的很好奇,考慮到人們對此狂歡!

從Maybelline的禮物中剩下的3個遮瑕膏,我沒有嘗試的是直接年齡倒帶橡皮擦遮瑕膏遮瑕膏治療,超級24小時遮瑕膏以及蓋子矯正器遮瑕膏。在3中,我很多關於嘗試橡皮擦黑暗區域遮瑕膏治療的思考 – 是否有人了解這是否適合於眼部區域?

我明白的是梅爾貝萊遮瑕膏的少數粉絲可用 – 這是你最喜歡的?

分享這個:
分享

點擊將此發送電子郵件給一個好朋友(在新窗口中打開)
5點擊以分享Pinterest(在新窗口中打開)5

單擊以在Twitter上共享(在新窗口中打開)
單擊以在Tumblr上共享(在新窗口中打開)

單擊以在RedDit上共享(在新窗口中打開)

像這樣:
喜歡加載……

有關的

COLLAB:收集持久的完美最大佩戴遮瑕膏的發布是與STYLEDWITHJOY的合作夥伴!我們都在幾個月前得到了持久的完美佩戴遮瑕膏。由於我們都在北美(她在美國,我在加拿大),我們都沒有直接進入這種崇拜的產品,特別是……
2015年9月15日“美”

基金會以及2016年的遮瑕膏清除已經很長一段時間了。我只需要長時間留下一段時間,也可以在理想的情緒中,從藏匿處擺脫一些產品。通常我覺得由於懷舊和我談論自己的懷舊而有點聯繫到產品……
2016年2月16日“美”

基金會,粉末,遮瑕膏中可能需要1或2個基礎(也許是冬天的冬天和夏天一個),這是一對遮瑕膏(在眼睛黑眼圈覆蓋瑕疵,披著瑕疵),以及與粉末的交易。那是正常的。為什麼我已經大量積累了這很多基礎/粉撲/遮瑕膏(或者我打電話給他們,基礎產品),……
2015年8月14日“美”

Leave A Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *